Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(102,942 posts)
7. When called out, NatGeo then lies that it "does not subscribe to pseudoscience"
Wed Mar 7, 2018, 11:11 AM
Mar 2018
He continued:

Of course National Geographic does not subscribe to pseudoscience, and I think you full well know that. But it doesn’t mean we can’t have a little fun.

https://gizmodo.com/national-geographic-just-sent-me-a-crystal-healing-wate-1823398246

But by buying the bottles at absurd prices, they are literally subscribing to pseudoscience. They're sending it money (it seems these promotional packs went out to many writers, to publicise the upcoming series, so it was a serious total) that a serious publisher ought to be using to fund a wildlife photographer or something. Instead, the snakeoil industry got the cash. Even if their intention was a "controversy" about them (which would indicate they had no confidence that the program can be marketed on its merits), it's still chucking money at con men for the sake of publicity.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»National Geographic Sent ...»Reply #7