Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)

11. No, I don't.

Reply to Warpy (Reply #10)

Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:07 PM

Sep 2014

No one has ever asked to label such a technology before. Labeling was pushed by one side of the industry to attack the other. Further, it would jack up food prices, as research into the matter has shown. (See my link above.) The other option is to stop using GMOs, which would likely lead to much worse environmental practices in terms of tilling and pesticide use.

Labeling is not the simple thing that anti-GMO folks want to pretend it is.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you really understand modern farming? Urbanite examines 10 myths of GMOs and organics [View all] HuckleB Sep 2014 OP

GMOS: AN INTRODUCTION (another worthy resource on the issue) HuckleB Sep 2014 #1

I don't have the scientific background to evaluate these claims, enough Sep 2014 #2

The site is very balanced, but it uses the actual scientific evidence. HuckleB Sep 2014 #3

A lot of the mistrust was caused by industry, itself Warpy Sep 2014 #4

The problem is the lack of justification for labeling. HuckleB Sep 2014 #5

The industry just created the paranoia by fighting so hard against something Warpy Sep 2014 #7

The paranoia was created by the organic industry. HuckleB Sep 2014 #9

Allowing labeling would have discouraged all but a few Warpy Sep 2014 #10

No, I don't. HuckleB Sep 2014 #11

And then we have the MSM, completely ignoring the science side of the equation, at times. HuckleB Sep 2014 #6

Well, that sort of arrogance of ivory tower "experts" exists at all levels. Warpy Sep 2014 #8

It looks badly written, to me muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #12

LOL! HuckleB Sep 2014 #13

Given your signature, that's a disappointing response muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #14

The writer knows her stuff. HuckleB Sep 2014 #15

And yet, I showed some simple logical mistakes muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #16

You made a claim that doesn't address the main content of the piece in any way. HuckleB Sep 2014 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Tumbulu Sep 2014 #20

19-year study of trillions of meals shows GE crops do not harm food-producing animals, humans HuckleB Sep 2014 #18

You keep forgetting... Archae Sep 2014 #19