Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
2. I've got a bit of a problem with all of the talk about "processed" foods too. Which processes?
Mon May 19, 2014, 06:03 PM
May 2014

I'm not doubting that there's a lot of what generally referred to as "processed foods" which are, let us say, less than nutritionally optimal.

However, there are all sorts of "processes" you can perform when making (or manufacturing) food, and they can't all be bad and equally bad. After all, baking is a process. Roasting is a process. Slicing, dicing, grinding, fermenting, boiling, broiling... those are all processes. Is a process good because your grandma's grandma could have done it in her kitchen, but bad because was invented sometime after 1900 and is done in a large vat?

If there was any solid research here, you'd think they could be specific about what which particular processes are detrimental, in what way and to what degree.

By the way, I am aware of how ingredients are listed in order by weight, but still makes it hard to figure out for something like my yogurt what portion of the 15 grams of sugar was already in the yogurt and in the fruit added to the yogurt before additional sweeteners were added. I can at least figure out by looking at a container of plain yogurt that it has much less total sugar, about 4 grams for an equal serving size.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Sugar vs. added sugar»Reply #2