Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(113,131 posts)
7. Also, those mechanical looms were not labor savers
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:27 PM
Sep 2013

For the people who worked them, they were labor intensifiers, forcing people to adapt to the speed of the machine instead of having a home based weaving business that would adapt to the weaver. While a few skilled weavers were put to work designing textiles, most ended up (if they were lucky) doing the backbreaking work of threading those old machines and being completely disconnected from either the planning or the final result. The effect was dehumanizing to the weavers even as it drove down the price of high quality cloth for everybody else.

The Luddites had a few valid points, in other words. There should have been room for cheap cloth from the machines and luxury cloth from master weavers but the latter only happened for the aristocracy and there weren't enough aristocrats to keep them all employed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Today's Luddites...»Reply #7