Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

MineralMan

(148,483 posts)

25. No, the alternative is to remove the privilege from religion-owned hospitals.

Reply to guillaumeb (Reply #8)

Tue Jun 25, 2019, 02:46 PM

Jun 2019

No religion should be able to dictate what healthcare they will offer. That is obscene, especially if a church-owned hospital is the only one available.

Pass laws. If the church can't follow them, let the church get out of the hospital business altogether. That would be my suggestion to solve the problem in any case. Provide everyone with legal healthcare or you may not own a hospital. Period.

The Roman Catholic Church should not be allowed to dictate what health care is delivered in an area. Not a chance.

A hospital is not a church. The RCC should limit its restrictions on healthcare services to its religious institutions, not hospitals that are open to the public.

Feh!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chamarro vs Dignity Health -catholic interference in the US HealthCare system. [View all] AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 OP

I have also posted about this before. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #1

There are barely any public hospitals anywhere. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2019 #3

Your contribution to dialogue? eom guillaumeb Jun 2019 #5

Your failure to recognize instruction is an ongoing issue. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2019 #6

So the people who live in those areas are just fucked, then? trotsky Jun 2019 #4

The alternative is to open public hospitals. eom guillaumeb Jun 2019 #8

Wow, such compassion and empathy for the people who are denied their medical choices. trotsky Jun 2019 #9

You DO recognize that what I wrote is the obvious answer, correct? guillaumeb Jun 2019 #10

No, it's not the obvious answer. And fuck your narrative bullshit. Knock it the fuck off already. trotsky Jun 2019 #11

Yes, the narrative meme. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #12

I said fuck your narrative bullshit. trotsky Jun 2019 #13

Eloquence. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #15

You get exactly the replies you have earned. trotsky Jun 2019 #17

More framing. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #18

You've painted the awful picture yourself. trotsky Jun 2019 #21

Self awareness is critical to an observer. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #22

Which is why many people frame your arguments properly, to help you become more self-aware. trotsky Jun 2019 #23

As I expected. eom guillaumeb Jun 2019 #26

Good. trotsky Jun 2019 #30

No, you wrote the obvious ideal situation. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2019 #14

We do have public hospitals. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #16

Less than 1/3 of them. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2019 #19

Very true. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #20

Even IF we had the political will, building a hospital takes time. trotsky Jun 2019 #24

What do you tell them? guillaumeb Jun 2019 #27

I tell them the RCC hurt them overnight. Because in most cases, it did. trotsky Jun 2019 #31

No, the alternative is to remove the privilege from religion-owned hospitals. MineralMan Jun 2019 #25

If most hospitals are owned by various religious orders, guillaumeb Jun 2019 #28

No, it doesnt. MineralMan Jun 2019 #29

What a horrific answer edhopper Jun 2019 #32

But everywhere there are states. States have laws. AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 #7

They seek total control. If they can't get it one way, they'll try another way. MineralMan Jun 2019 #2