Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(148,475 posts)
21. That reminds me of the rules for female students at my 1960s high school.
Wed Apr 3, 2019, 11:55 AM
Apr 2019

Even if a girl was married, which a few were, she was not allowed to attend school if she was visibly pregnant. No alternative was offered. If you showed, you were out. And that was in a public school. The same rule applied to women who were teachers. You were not allowed to teach if you were visibly pregnant.

It was bizarre. I remember thinking that even then as a high school kid. What did they think? That seeing a pregnant person would make people want to get pregnant? That it would encourage sexual activity among the students?

The reality was that some high school kids, even in the early 1960s, were sexually active. Pregnancy was the worst possible outcome in those kids minds, I can guarantee, since I was one of the sexually active teenagers. Preventing that outcome was paramount on our minds. Some of us were successful in preventing a pregnancy. Others were not so successful, and we had a few pregnancies at our small high school. A few pre-graduation marriages, too.

But, to ban pregnant young women from finishing high school? What a strange thing. Keeping pregnant teachers from teaching? How bizarre is that?

Those rules disappeared at the end of that decade at that school, thank goodness. I guess some Catholic schools haven't gotten past the early 60s, though.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yep .... welcome to 1912, everyone. Ohiogal Apr 2019 #1
Just another example of ridiculous religious BS. However, I do wonder in today's world why anyone walkingman Apr 2019 #2
The Catholic religion forbids all birth control. Ohiogal Apr 2019 #7
I guess that might be why the Priests are so attracted to boys? Don't have to worry about birth walkingman Apr 2019 #9
Stop working for Catholic Schools zipplewrath Apr 2019 #3
They also get away with a lot of shit Ohiogal Apr 2019 #6
Maybe... NeoGreen Apr 2019 #8
Don't entirely disagree zipplewrath Apr 2019 #11
Nobody forces anyone to send their child to a Catholic school. JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #14
I make the oberservation that a school... NeoGreen Apr 2019 #16
"The Church insists all staffers have to play by their rules." trotsky Apr 2019 #4
Their rules don't cover that Lordquinton Apr 2019 #39
A religious minefield Cartoonist Apr 2019 #5
Not a joke HockeyMom Apr 2019 #12
That reminds me of the rules for female students at my 1960s high school. MineralMan Apr 2019 #21
Has she tried telling them they're reading the Bible wrong? Act_of_Reparation Apr 2019 #10
Hypocrisy Running Rampant! MineralMan Apr 2019 #13
If a person doesn't like the rules at a Catholic school... JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #15
Ah, OK... MineralMan Apr 2019 #17
It's not always an option to "get a different job." trotsky Apr 2019 #18
So, you're saying religious organizations should be limited by law. JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #19
This may come as a shock to you, but they already are. trotsky Apr 2019 #20
How did the subject of racial discrimination enter this discussion? JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #23
Because of your statement - "religious organizations should be limited by law" trotsky Apr 2019 #25
To unsplit the hair that you split. JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #26
Now you're the one trying to change the subject. trotsky Apr 2019 #34
So catholic schools should only hire... NeoGreen Apr 2019 #22
Or people willing to comply with Catholic standards. JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #24
I also think any person should have the right to practice their religion but IMO that does not walkingman Apr 2019 #27
They still do that janterry Apr 2019 #29
You weren't an employee. JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #30
Should Priests be fired when they engage sexual activities? That doesn't happen? walkingman Apr 2019 #32
"If you aren't a Catholic, don't apply to work for a Catholic company." trotsky Apr 2019 #35
Yeah, but you explicitly stated... NeoGreen Apr 2019 #37
I agree. I was offered a job working in an eating disorder program janterry Apr 2019 #28
Wow, thank you for that. nt JayhawkSD Apr 2019 #31
PA billymerk Apr 2019 #33
After many decades of moving pederast priests around instead of firing them. keithbvadu2 Apr 2019 #36
Because that's not against Catholic law Lordquinton Apr 2019 #40
Equal enforcement of the "no sinning" clause CloudWatcher Apr 2019 #38
why can't they just put a Mrs. in front of her name and call it quits. demigoddess Apr 2019 #41
It's funny how obcessed with everyone being married Lordquinton Apr 2019 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Catholic School To Pregna...»Reply #21