Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

violetpastille

(1,483 posts)
2. I see where you are going with this but I have to disagree?
Mon Dec 24, 2018, 02:33 PM
Dec 2018

Religion is something that we created along with our human language to control our environment and each other. It was a separation from the parts of us that we share with other beings and a stepping off into the abstract. The scientist and the theologian are more alike than different.

Our very ancient ancestors, our "primitive" ancestors were so well adapted to their environments that they didn't have a priest class as such. There were shamans but the shamans hunted and gathered along with everyone else with only rare exceptions.

With the rise of agriculture there came a leisure class and a priest/banking class. That's when the cognitive biases really got going. "Why do you get to sit around and boss and I have to move these boulders?" "Because I am noble" "Because I am holy."

All abstractions that require a lot of strategy and marketing to pull off.

The invention of "Religion" has less to do with emotions and intuitions and more to do with getting trapped in our own "reasoning" while trying to control the emotions and intuitions of the peasant class.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great post. Wellstone ruled Dec 2018 #1
I see where you are going with this but I have to disagree? violetpastille Dec 2018 #2
And is any human really free of this? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #3
Atheism is NOT the declaration edhopper Dec 2018 #4
There is no science behind atheism. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #5
Balderdash! edhopper Dec 2018 #6
No, there is no evidence or proof for your position. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #7
Any evidence that this supernatural entity you call God edhopper Dec 2018 #8
The existence of the created universe itself. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #9
I'm sorry. I don't understand the sentence in your title. MineralMan Dec 2018 #10
Edited to correct my error. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #12
Ah, OK, but there is no evidence that it was MineralMan Dec 2018 #13
There is no evidence that edhopper Dec 2018 #11
Or, more to the point, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #16
Is there evidence edhopper Dec 2018 #17
define alternate or parallel universe Lordquinton Dec 2018 #14
Simple logic to follow Lordquinton Dec 2018 #15
It turtles edhopper Dec 2018 #18
That's just your cognitive bias Lordquinton Dec 2018 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Cognitive Biases or Error...»Reply #2