Religion

It’s just like every other time you’ve falsely accused myself and others of name calling. I’ve asked you repeatedly what name you were called and received nothing better than nonsense snark in lieu of a reply.

The IQ response was an answer to who else, besides you is claiming Russell is intolerant which means yes there are some atheist hating anonymous morons on the internet claiming Russell is intolerant. This was in response to your ridiculous claim that Russell’s intolerance is “well known”. I made no assertion or implications to your IQ. That dog won’t hunt and you either know it or should know it because no, I just don’t think you are that stupid.

I accused you of libel because you are guilty of libel. Your ridiculous argument for “extreme intolerance” of Russell was because he called the behavior of those who cling to myths a “little contemptible”. Others who dared to call bullshit were called the same which I’m sure was your intention when you created the OP. That’s exactly what libel is. If you don’t like being called a libeler, don’t defame others. As we both agreed, it ain’t name calling if it’s true.

As far as butt hurt goes that has nothing to do with IQ and it’s more than a bit silly to claim otherwise. You have a long history of disingenuously claiming victimization in this group. You did it with this OP and again with this latest reply. You frequently dish out condescending replies, refer to many of us as the “choir” as a perjorative, and yes engage in creepy cyberstalking behavior against myself and MM if not others. You invent silly rules for this group and then whine incessantly when you think they are violated. When you’re called out for your bad behavior you pretend you’re getting personally attacked. So yeah, “butt hurt” is actually a pretty mild way of putting it and spot on.

Meanwhile pretending you’re even remotely interested in intelligent discourse is ridiculous. In addition to what was previously mentioned, you have a plethora of tactics that specifically avoid anything close to intellectual discussion. You demand answers for all sorts of things, yet almost never provide any in return. You have a handful of canned responses you repeat ad nausem that you pretend constitutes substance as if everyone is too stupid to realize otherwise. You author all sorts of logical fallacies repeatedly even after getting called out for it by several people.

All of this may seem harsh, but if you’re going to accuse me of something you’d better have something to back it up as I promise I will give better than I get.