Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. That ends up costing more in some cases.
Wed Sep 25, 2013, 09:55 AM
Sep 2013

Bureaucracy begets bureaucracy.

If you hire a vet, their time working for the government as a civilian is added to their military service and becomes part/parcel of their pension package. The contractors get more money up front, and none downstream, and they can be dumped on a moment's notice. It's much harder to dump a career civil servant.

I think there needs to be independent "desk audits" of every damn job (and that includes the Big Wigs, the top management tiers) associated with government. Not just contractor positions, but civil service ones as well. The military does this every so often, as they adjust end strength to meet operational requirements, and they will probably need to keep tweaking their billet allocations as we continue with this latest drawdown.

So much money goes to waste, and in many cases, the bean counters can't figure out where the hell the money went even when they go back and try to audit the process.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Reforming pension and health programs." Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #1
More force shaping ahead! Early outs, tougher PT tests, more drug testing, etc.... MADem Sep 2013 #2
They should be eliminating most of the contractor and replacing them with qualified returning ... Historic NY Sep 2013 #4
That ends up costing more in some cases. MADem Sep 2013 #5
Your are incorrect. westerebus Sep 2013 #9
No, I'm not. In the end--and I see nothing wrong with this practice, but it is a fact--the vet MADem Sep 2013 #10
We get 5 points for being veterns on the exams we take for qualification too. westerebus Sep 2013 #12
No, I don't this is "unfair" at all. It's a benefit of service. MADem Sep 2013 #13
I am in no way being "shitty" with you. westerebus Sep 2013 #14
Then do it! gopiscrap Sep 2013 #3
Sounds good, but that's another 110,000 on the street... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #6
From my perspective the problem starts here: unhappycamper Sep 2013 #7
Always has been, but... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #8
That's not the national budget, though. MADem Sep 2013 #11
The military budget is in discretionary spending, not mandatory spending. unhappycamper Sep 2013 #15
And discretionary spending is less than a third of the total budget. MADem Sep 2013 #16
And the military budget comes out of the same (Discretionary) pie as Labor, Education, Science, etc. unhappycamper Sep 2013 #17
Yes, it's 57 percent of thirty percent. nt MADem Sep 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Pentagon could cut thousa...»Reply #5