Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
15. Except that the ATF said the
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 08:16 PM
Nov 2016

tracing data does not actually say that. It simply means the guns were purchased in those states at one time. Given that they "time to crime" is over a decade, the evidence does not support it. Not all of them are crime guns, and not all crime guns are traced. Question, how exactly do those gang members buy guns in those states? They certainly don't go to those gun stores, given that the Gun Control Act bans interstate transactions by non-FFL holders. They did not fill out federal forms before NICS including proving state of residence, and they don't do the background check now.
Also, several criminology studies show that criminals rarely go to gun stores. They almost never go to gun shows.
If you know current federal gun control laws, you know that.
https://www.atf.gov/docs/163564-ilatfwebsite15pdf/download

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Should Ammunition Buyers ...»Reply #15