Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)

3. How much more shit can you pack into one OP?

Reply to Eleanors38 (Original post)

Wed Sep 7, 2016, 03:18 PM

Sep 2016

UBC, gun bans, culture war, prohibitionists.

Has it occurred to you that you are posting on a Democratic website and extolling the virtues of Republican obstructionism?

Murky issues? Can't Compete with the GOP?

"By now, most here on this site -- and in the country at-large -- know gun control is a self-defeating issue. But much of the Party structure is still cemented to the issue,"

No, by now most on this tiny sub group of this website are hopelessly inflicted with cranial rectal inversion.

Sure you wouldn't be more comfortable at Breitbart?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Zika funding stalls due to RW riders. UBC fails due to gun-control riders... [View all] Eleanors38 Sep 2016 OP

It is only. deathrind Sep 2016 #1

Bull. beevul Sep 2016 #2

You mean the laws that were passed. deathrind Sep 2016 #10

If you weren't referring to laws, what did you mean by compromise? beevul Sep 2016 #17

What do you think of Feinstein's riders to the UBC proposal, post Sandy Hook? Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #5

How much more shit can you pack into one OP? flamin lib Sep 2016 #3

You want to compare your liberalism with mine? Tell me. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #4

Is that a personal call out? nt flamin lib Sep 2016 #9

After asking about Breitbart "comfort" levels, I coulda sworn it was the opposite. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #18

The things you posted are identical to what I see at Breitbart. Just sayin . . .nt flamin lib Sep 2016 #19

Hell, they may agree with me on who was the first president, too. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #20

"only some strange anatomical speculations you seem unusually expert on." Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #11

I'm pretty sure I'm being ignored as well discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #12

If the rationale is, "You just can't reason with these gunners!" Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #13

'Tis a question of the ages and as old as time discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #14

"Sure you wouldn't be more comfortable at Breitbart?" He hasn't advocated voting GOP like you did: friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #7

Ouch, that will leave a mark Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #16

This group is enormous Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #15

Isn't this typical of how all legislation is put together? JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #6

Actually, imo, compromise usually comes with measure of degree and authority-sharing... Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #8