What gun-control really ought to do [View all]
![](/emoticons/think.gif)
One thing gun-control really really ought to get a new name. Having that unfortunate "control" term stuck in there is mostly a myth. Laws don't control people.
![](/emoticons/cool.gif)
People control themselves; people can control other people. The most effective laws would be those that motivate and empower people. Empowering a gun owner to access a background check for a private sale is empowering. Requiring folks to register, pay fees and buy insurance is not empowering nor do they inspire cooperation.
![](/emoticons/banghead.gif)
Gun-control really needs to give up on the idea of banning damn near anything.
![](/emoticons/facepalm.gif)
The pro-control needs to lose the idea that semi-auto guns which
look like ARs, AKs, M-16s... are any more dangerous than any other semi-auto ranch/varmint gun of equivalent caliber.
![](/emoticons/eyes.gif)
We've had several horrific domestic terror attacks some with firearms. In no case was .50 cal used to shoot down an aircraft. Let go of that one for good.
![](/emoticons/thumbsup.gif)
Finally, give up on the idea that the Second Amendment covers only state run militias. The individual rights view is now the law of the land.