Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

(12,194 posts)

1. Slanted.

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:33 AM

Feb 2016

But both state and federal law do not provide such protections for victims who have obtained a temporary restraining order.

That may have something to do with due process.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The danger between ‘temporary’ and ‘permanent’ [View all] SecularMotion Feb 2016 OP

Slanted. beevul Feb 2016 #1

Temporary restraining orders do not violate due process SecularMotion Feb 2016 #2

Picking cherries again? Straw Man Feb 2016 #3

You accuse me of cherry picking? SecularMotion Feb 2016 #4

Yes, I do. Straw Man Feb 2016 #5