Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
5. I don't live in California, but I totally reject the binary nature of your question.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jan 2016

Democrat or not, if I believe a candidate is unqualified or otherwise awful, I need not vote for him or her at all. That certainly does not mean I must vote for the Republican candidate.

Besides voting against Harris in the Senate primary, a Democrat could simply choose to stay home rather than vote in the election or write-in the name of someone else.

Simply, every candidate must earn my vote, and not take mine or anyone else's for granted. I'm a lifelong registered Democrat and generally vote the party line because I like and agree with our candidates. However, the onus is always on the candidate to demonstrate their value to me. When our Party and candidates fail to do so and simply expect Democrats to act like dutiful automatons, we have situations like Martha Coakley in Massachusetts, a two-time statewide loser who went on vacation rather than campaign against Scott Brown.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Attorney General Harris -...»Reply #5