Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What is the best ccw self defense gun in your opinion? [View all]Straw Man
(6,830 posts)68. Beretta Nano is a striker-fired pistol.
Advantages of the Beretta Nano (and similar pistols)
Is that you keep your thumb where the hammer comes back while putting it in a holster or pocket so that if the trigger catches you don't mistakenly fire the pistol because you can feel the hammer coming back and stop in time. With a striker fired pistol, it is easy to shoot yourself in the foot while holstering the pistol.
Is that you keep your thumb where the hammer comes back while putting it in a holster or pocket so that if the trigger catches you don't mistakenly fire the pistol because you can feel the hammer coming back and stop in time. With a striker fired pistol, it is easy to shoot yourself in the foot while holstering the pistol.
You may be thinking of one of the other "baby Berettas," like the Tomcat or Pico. The Nano is striker-fired, and reminds me very much of a Glock 26, except slimmer.
Striker-fired pistols are fine as long as you are careful that nothing enters the trigger guard while you are reholstering. This means not only your finger, but your shirttails, jacket drawstrings, etc. If this is a problem for you, there are striker-fired pistols with manual safeties. The Ruger LC9S is one.
If you want a small pistol with an exposed hammer, a SIG P238 is hard to beat. It is single-action-only, with a thumb safety. It is meant to be carried cocked-and-locked, and is perfectly safe to carry that way. It has an additional safety feature in that you can rack the slide to remove the round in the chamber without taking the safety off, unlike traditional SAO pistols like the 1911. It is slightly heavier than pistols like the LCP, but this is an advantage in that additional weight means less felt recoil. Lightweight polymer handguns like the LCP (and the LC9S, for that matter) feel to me like a firecracker going off in my hand. The P238 is much milder and more pleasant to shoot, and I'm of the opinion that you should enjoy shooting the pistol that you're going to carry for defense or you won't practice with it, and if you don't practice with it, you really shouldn't be carrying it.
NB: With a single-action-only pistol, your thumb action when reholstering will be different. Instead of placing your thumb behind the hammer so that you could feel if started to come back, you would place your thumb in front of the cocked hammer to block it in case it starts to fall. And if you remembered to engage the thumb safety (which is one of the reasons you practice), it's very unlikely that you'll encounter such a problem.
EDIT TO ADD: I think the danger of "Glock leg," AKA shooting yourself in the foot while reholstering, has been oversold. There have been a few well-publicized incidents that were probably the result of poor trigger discipline on the part of police officers who were transitioning from the heavy triggers of their double-action revolvers. Since the 1980s, there have been millions of striker-fired pistols in use by citizens and cops alike, and there are very few incidents. But ultimately it's up to you; if your not comfortable with it, don't carry it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
God, what a shitty thing to say about that exchange. But then, par for your course.
villager
Oct 2015
#16
No -- because the point about the NRA *not* allowing concealed carry is still valid
villager
Oct 2015
#26
Actually, according to this: "the NRA staff is armed, while visitors are disarmed"
villager
Oct 2015
#46
You need to stop posting on this thread. ( took you off ignore only to point this out)
darkangel218
Oct 2015
#48
Your claim about the NRA has been shown to be incorrect at least twice
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#82
Whatever pistol you find that you are most comfortable shooting and with which you have trained
S_B_Jackson
Oct 2015
#10
a dog... guns are not for defense. anyone who thinks they are are not familiar with the statistics.
bowens43
Oct 2015
#14
You are free to decide that for yourself. You are *not* free to decide that for others
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#31
Can you explain to me then what are the disadvantages of carrying a PT111 vs Nano?
darkangel218
Oct 2015
#30