Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Drug Policy

the other one

(1,499 posts)

5. I had him for a class at Univ. Del. back in the late 80s.

Reply to Upton (Reply #4)

Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:11 PM

Feb 2012

He came across as career-ladder-climber who would defend anyone who could pay his fee, regardless of how he felt about their guilt or innocence. Come to think of it, that describes most defense attorneys anyway. Persons of high character need not apply.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Medical marijuana law busted (Delaware) [View all] the other one Feb 2012 OP

Why does the DOJ hate our freedom? think Feb 2012 #1

Pot policy bongbong Feb 2012 #2

+1 "The war on Drugs. Keeping prisons full since 1971" think Feb 2012 #3

wow RainDog Feb 2012 #6

It's the Wikipedia entry for "War on Drugs": think Feb 2012 #7

thanks RainDog Feb 2012 #8

U.S. Attorney Oberly is a Democrat and an Obama appointee.. Upton Feb 2012 #4

I had him for a class at Univ. Del. back in the late 80s. the other one Feb 2012 #5

Wait, what? eggplant Feb 2012 #9

Oh come on. You know they are guilty. They wouldn't be in court if they weren't. And defense uppityperson Feb 2012 #11

Here's hoping you never need one! countryjake Feb 2012 #10

The only professional service to which you have a constitutional right jberryhill Feb 2012 #13

LOL. So, defense attorneys should take on as clients only those people that they themselves PA Democrat Feb 2012 #15

Where are all the folks who usually chime in on these threads . . . markpkessinger Feb 2012 #12

There is clearly no doubt... CanSocDem Feb 2012 #14