Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. I don't think that it was necessary for the terror
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 03:59 AM
Apr 2012

to be so horrible. The French monarchy, however, was overly reluctant to respect the natural rights of ordinary people. The effects of the reign of terror were devastating to the country -- just horrible and, as we know, the whole thing ended with Napoleon and a France with an unstable government for a long, long time.

So, I don't think the terror was necessary. I don't know whether the French could have ended the monarchy through strictly peaceful means. Nonviolence was not given a chance -- by either the nobility or the ordinary people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»World History»Was the Terror necessary ...»Reply #2