Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thucythucy

(8,819 posts)
1. I think the title was meant at least in part to be ironic.
Sun Oct 22, 2023, 02:10 PM
Oct 2023

A big part of the book, especially toward the beginning, is a description of how those truly knowledgeable on SE Asia were driven out of the State Department by the McCarthy anti-communist hysteria of the 1950s. What Kennedy inherited were the yes men--like Dean Rusk--who survived because their lack of deep knowledge about the region kept them from making "controversial" assessments of the situation--for instance, that the French occupation was doomed, that Ho Chi Minh was first and foremost a nationalist, that American military intervention would be disastrous, etc.

One tidbit I remember from my reading--long ago--was that there wasn't a single "expert" on SE Asia in the State Department who spoke Vietnamese. In fact, through the 50s anything to do with Indochina was handled by the French desk at State.

It's a fantastic book, and along with "The Powers That Be" essential reading for anyone interested in the history of that era.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»On September 1, 1972, Dav...»Reply #1