Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thucythucy

(8,819 posts)
4. It's impossible to know now, of course.
Sun Sep 26, 2021, 11:31 AM
Sep 2021

And yes it would have been a struggle. But the Kennedys did have support even among traditional Democrats (that is to say, not Peacenik McCarthy supporters) and they also had access to an incredible ground game apparatus, both outside and inside the convention. RFK was that rare candidate who had support among white working class Dems, antiwar Dems, and people of color.

But Chicago would have been a mess, no matter what the outcome. I often wonder though if there might not have been a Humphrey/Kennedy ticket. Humphrey was after all secretly conflicted about the war, and certainly after Tet but even before only publicly supported it out of loyalty to LBJ (who went out of his way to screw him anyway). Aside from his red baiting past in the 50s, Humphrey was to the left of LBJ, which is generally forgotten now because of his association with that disastrous war.

But it's all now a game of what-if.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»I Saw John Wilkes Booth S...»Reply #4