Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wnylib

(25,183 posts)
1. I disagree with the claim that
Sat Nov 21, 2020, 12:00 PM
Nov 2020

"they didn't come (to this site) through the interior of the continent, which would have been under miles of ice."

True, they could not have moved from north to south through what is now Canada due to the ice. But if their ancestors followed a water route along the Pacific coast and then followed rivers and streams inland across the continent south of the glaciers, they would have found many places to make villages and hunting camps on the southern edges of the glaciers. Meadowcroft is probably just one of many such sites. I would expect to find evidence of some more settled sites not too far away from the temporary hunting camp site at Meadowcroft.

The edges of glaciers have cool moderate climates that are rich with water sources from glacial meltwaters. The waters, as pools, streams, and swamps, attract game animals for the water and for grazing on plant growth around the waters.

I would bet that more sites could be found in North America by searching, west to east, along areas that used to be on the southern edge of the glaciers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I disagree with the claim that wnylib Nov 2020 #1
"I disagree with the claim that ..." left-of-center2012 Nov 2020 #2
What's the point of linking to the newspaper? wnylib Nov 2020 #3
okie dokie smokie left-of-center2012 Nov 2020 #4
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»Archaeologists probe olde...»Reply #1