Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfz9580m

(16,638 posts)
4. That's idiotically disproportionate
Tue Oct 28, 2025, 08:37 AM
Oct 2025

They are just using the law as assholes would.

The only reason all the oligarchs and their sycophants are not charged is they keep destroying all regulations:

https://www.salon.com/2025/10/12/elon-musk-company-accused-of-nearly-800-environmental-violations_partner/

Elon Musk company accused of nearly 800 environmental violations
Nevada could’ve fined the company more than $3 million, but regulators are seeking a reduced penalty of $242,800


In the past, Musk has espoused paying penalties rather than waiting for approvals as a way of doing business.

​​“Environmental regulations are, in my view, largely terrible,” he said at an event with the libertarian Cato Institute last year. “You have to get permission in advance, as opposed to, say, paying a penalty if you do something wrong, which I think would be much more effective.”

Neither Musk nor Boring responded to requests for comment for this story.

Because it is privately funded and receives no federal money, the project is exempt from many exhaustive governmental vetting and environmental analysis requirements. But it is required to obtain state permits to ensure the waste does not contaminate the environment or local water sources.



That’s just one recent story that caught my eye as there too many to keep up with and one gets numb to it.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I can understand that would be against the rules Diamond_Dog Oct 2025 #1
OK, explain it to me. ananda Oct 2025 #15
For pulling herself up by the bootstraps... Trueblue Texan Oct 2025 #2
The person who wrote that headline cloudbase Oct 2025 #3
Yes absolutely. Srkdqltr Oct 2025 #8
Why? Because of bad grammar? Wednesdays Oct 2025 #25
Untrue, elleng Oct 2025 #26
Baked goods made with food stamps probably aren't very tasty, cloudbase Oct 2025 #28
That's idiotically disproportionate jfz9580m Oct 2025 #4
You're right! In our case the penalty is far in excess of the cost of doing it right dickthegrouch Oct 2025 #31
Well, the narcotics war jfz9580m Oct 2025 #42
I think this attached to the wrong thread dickthegrouch Oct 2025 #43
Prosecutors should have to PROVE where the butter and flour came from NewLarry Oct 2025 #5
How can they know? Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #18
And we have a convicted felon, pedophile, and rapists in the WH. Ferrets are Cool Oct 2025 #6
A a convicted felon, pedophile, and rapist who is OUT ON BAIL after being indicted for election interfereance in GA! Attilatheblond Oct 2025 #17
Ruin somebody's life, Turbineguy Oct 2025 #7
So, a black woman gets a little government money, adds labor & makes something... CaptainTruth Oct 2025 #9
No explanation as to how she was caught Layzeebeaver Oct 2025 #10
She was advertising on facebook questionseverything Oct 2025 #30
And who caught her? Layzeebeaver Oct 2025 #32
Advertising what exactly? Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #36
Snap, Medicaid and cash assistance have very strict rules questionseverything Oct 2025 #37
Was she advertising breaking the law???? Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #38
If she's on snap how do you think she can afford a good lawyer? questionseverything Oct 2025 #39
There is legal aid Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #41
Jury nullification. @Michigan peeps nilram Oct 2025 #11
Although it's not hard to see why she can't do that... JohnnyRingo Oct 2025 #12
Trump's free plane is not so free for us tax payers. Emile Oct 2025 #13
Can't say she was too lazy to work. She added value to the food through her labor doc03 Oct 2025 #14
SNAP as it currently exists isn't really meant to help people but to keep them dependent and unempowered. cstanleytech Oct 2025 #16
There are other programs that provide those other benefits Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #20
As someone who is on SNAP, I can explain synni Oct 2025 #29
I see how it can be difficult Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #33
They should be expanded and made common place, that would keep the top 1%ers from demonizing them questionseverything Oct 2025 #40
Does this"profit" include her labor idahoblue Oct 2025 #19
To the letter of this law I believe the goods would House of Roberts Oct 2025 #21
Exactly Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #34
Can the country get any lower? I fear it can, but JFC this is getting beyond absurd. Bev54 Oct 2025 #22
How many maga take funds and use them for something else? GreenWave Oct 2025 #23
No worries, dumpie loves to pardon innocent people for free. KS Toronado Oct 2025 #24
For once, it's not racial profiling...just a little-known law synni Oct 2025 #27
Unless she posted on line claiming she used food bought with SNAP benefits Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #35
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Cooking & Baking»Black woman in Michigan f...»Reply #4