Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

csziggy

(34,189 posts)
16. A lot of family trees are completely inaccurate
Mon Apr 4, 2022, 03:20 AM
Apr 2022

Never rely on someone else's trees for reliable information. The most I ever do is to look to see what their actual sources - meaning records, not yet someone else's tree - and see if those are accurate. And then I check to see if the record they used as a source is correct for the person I am researching. Often it is not.

I ran into a series of trees about an ancestor of mine, an Aaron Harlan. Now, in that line, there was a series of four or five Aaron Harlans, father to son, etc. That series of trees had Aarons married to their mothers, or to their son's wives, or various other combinations. How screwed up is a tree when they list a man as being married to a woman who died before he was born?

I only bother correcting inaccuracies for actual records, mostly transcription errors for census records. Most notable was the surname transcribed as both "Lucker" and "Fucker" when it should have been Tucker - not the same Tucker, either.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think if you have an account you can do it. Ocelot II Nov 2021 #1
I found it too intrusive, and got off it. secondwind Nov 2021 #2
I actually leave some incorrect information on my trees Sherman A1 Nov 2021 #3
I get your point, but facts are facts bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #5
No, they're not. Buckeye_Democrat Nov 2021 #13
I have seen a family tree for one wnylib Nov 2021 #14
Absolutely! I especially learned to question... Buckeye_Democrat Nov 2021 #15
I am on Ancestry all the time, it is a hobby of mine. Irish_Dem Nov 2021 #4
Ugh mahina Nov 2021 #6
You don't correct other people's trees. You make your own. njhoneybadger Nov 2021 #7
I had a family tree done in 1895 or so. I felt an obligation to put it applegrove Nov 2021 #8
Imagine finding your 1895 tree expanded with 3 times the number of people in your families bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #9
Yes. For me I wasn't afraid of mistakes, I can see how aggravating that would be. For me it applegrove Nov 2021 #10
OK - you need to realize this isn't how Ancestry works. Algernon Moncrieff Nov 2021 #11
Yes, I'm beginning to realize bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #12
I've actually hired them on and with my finding out stuff they were pretty successful Historic NY Jul 2022 #19
A lot of family trees are completely inaccurate csziggy Apr 2022 #16
If it's a family tree, and you have an account Montauk6 Jul 2022 #17
Lots of people jumble stuff they think is theirs.... Historic NY Jul 2022 #18
True surnames may timms139 Mar 2024 #20
The census takers in any given area tended to be the ethnicity of earlier immigrants bucolic_frolic Mar 2024 #21
Supposedly my grandfather had a... duncang Jun 2024 #22
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»How do you correct inform...»Reply #16