Health

hlthe2b

(107,627 posts)

11. What the hell? I never even implied that the surgeon did NOT understand the terms. WTF?

Thu Jan 9, 2025, 12:46 PM

Jan 9

I am talking about the silly damned habit that some think they should have to do to talk to someone--the insurance asshole with the authority to deny claims and THUS SHOULD BE EDUCATED ON BASIC TERMS. None of my colleagues do that. We speak simply and at the level appropriate to true "lay" patients and others with a minimum of highly technical jargon, but we don't dumb it down for those who should know better.

Nor do we talk about " buttcracks" or "pits" or "pubes" or other crass terms like the drifting supposed ob/gyn and creator of Lume-- who sounds like she is auditioning for a damned porn film. Is this why some think we are all supposed to speak like a damned moron or the most uneducated sex worker?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Out of control': Cancer surgeon claims UnitedHealthcare questioned her mid-procedure [View all] cbabe Jan 9 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author onecaliberal Jan 9 #1

Put that insurance worker in jail. ....he would murder the patient. Trueblue1968 Jan 9 #34

Insurance is out of control, yes; but why did the surgeon take the call mid-procedure? unblock Jan 9 #2

Don't know why the surgeon took the call. Could be cbabe Jan 9 #3

I think once the procedure has started, they should finish it and resolve any insurance matters after unblock Jan 9 #6

That sounds correct and medically best. Until lawyers and money people stick their noses in. Which is the stupid cbabe Jan 9 #8

It's amazing how some people want to put the onus on the healthcare provider. . . UniqueUserName Jan 9 #10

Yeah. Poor judgement. I wouldn't want her as my surgeon for anything more than a hangnail. 3Hotdogs Jan 9 #38

I agree in principle, but there's a major power disparity in play here that can't be ignored. ShazzieB Jan 9 #39

That's for sure, it's an incredibly f*cked up way of delivering healthcare unblock Jan 9 #40

We have that luxury. This doc was protecting the patient mahina Jan 9 #20

There was probably a very good reason. yardwork Jan 9 #26

How is a partial procedure billed?? unblock Jan 9 #28

I'm not sure I understand your question. yardwork Jan 9 #32

So what happens if half a surgery takes place, then is put on hold for more insurance questions. unblock Jan 9 #35

The insurance company probably wouldn't pay at all. yardwork Jan 9 #36

Exactly Unladen Swallow Jan 9 #33

While I don't want to criticize the surgeon, but she was not "asleep!" She was under GD ANESTHESIA!!! hlthe2b Jan 9 #4

I'm sure the surgeon fully understands the terms, but I'll give them a pass when talking to a reporter unblock Jan 9 #7

Seems kinda mean to pick on the surgeon for word use when insurance cbabe Jan 9 #9

Give me a damned break. I did not remove the insurance idiot's responsibility, but the surgeon hlthe2b Jan 9 #12

"under anesthesia" is beyond your understanding? REALLY? hlthe2b Jan 9 #13

Of course I understand it. Just saying either the surgeon or the reporter or the editor might have dumbed it down unblock Jan 9 #18

your misintepretation is beyond the pale, cbabe... hlthe2b Jan 9 #16

What the hell? I never even implied that the surgeon did NOT understand the terms. WTF? hlthe2b Jan 9 #11

Ummm. Ok. Bye now. cbabe Jan 9 #15

Gratefully... hlthe2b Jan 9 #17

I think you're reading much too much into some of the posts on this thread. unblock Jan 9 #22

I am talking about what the surgeon said to the insurance official, not a reporter. It is the surgeon's hlthe2b Jan 9 #23

I have no particular insight into that conversation except the surgeon's account as filtered through the reporting unblock Jan 9 #24

The title of your #4 had me confused -- progree Jan 9 #19

Yes... Thank you for taking the time to read & think about it rather than make the accusations hlthe2b Jan 9 #21

UHC is lying, they knew exactly what they was doing with this case. Irish_Dem Jan 9 #5

"Collins described crying .. while handling calls from desperate patients, as supervisors laughed." [UnitedHealthcare] progree Jan 9 #14

Americans don't have to stand for this. yardwork Jan 9 #25

Doesn't surprise me in the least Jilly_in_VA Jan 9 #27

And their stock was $8 up yesterday, and touted as a "market leader" Bristlecone Jan 9 #29

Fucking gross abuse of power. Evolve Dammit Jan 9 #30

This is an example of folks unable to say no. Whoever LuckyLib Jan 9 #31

I think I would second-guess the insurance company before I second-guessed the doctor. But that's just me. NBachers Jan 9 #37

Drop everything you're doing and talk to me, an insurance agent !!! KS Toronado Jan 9 #41