Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israel/Palestine

Beastly Boy

(11,594 posts)

7. They are attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Reply to moniss (Reply #6)

Sun Dec 1, 2024, 03:18 PM

Dec 1

A fact you may have already surmised based on the post above.

Remember,
1. As per the cease fire agreement between Israel and Lebanon, which Lebanon is signatory to, Hezbollah is forbidden from carrying arms ANYWHERE in Lebanon. If it weren't in Lebanon, Lebanon would have no need to sign the damn agreement,
and
2. As per the US guarantees that came with the cease fire agreement between Israel and Lebanon, which Lebanon is is signatory to, it is Israel's right to strike Hezbollah forces that are in violation of the cease fire agreement.

Lebanon agreed to this. In writing. Lebanon, therefore, does not consider this to be either an attack on Lebanon, or a violation of the cease fire agreement. It is all there, on paper, in the text of the agreement I gave you a link to.

Is it really asking too much to read the damn link before you respond?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Mosby Meowmee

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

With ceasefire holding, Home Front Command eases restrictions in northern Israel [View all] moniss Dec 1 OP

All Hezbollah has to do is stop shooting missiles comradebillyboy Dec 1 #1

If you read the article there were no missiles fired from Sidon. nt moniss Dec 1 #5

Oh, that completely erases the effect of tens of thousands of missiles fired from elswhere in Lebanon Beastly Boy Dec 1 #11

The report is about now and I think it's pretty obvious the moniss Dec 1 #13

The response was to your post, not the OP. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #20

The article is only a "mystery" to those who don't (or refuse to) pay attention to the text of the cease fire agreement. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #2

Too funny. Eko Dec 1 #3

Look up the definition of an offensive military operation Beastly Boy Dec 1 #4

Laughing even harder!!!! Eko Dec 1 #8

Brilliant! Beastly Boy Dec 1 #9

Sure sure, Eko Dec 1 #10

You never disappoint! Beastly Boy Dec 1 #14

Yeah, you dont control what you cant defend. Derp. Eko Dec 1 #15

And just to let you know. Eko Dec 1 #12

Could it possibly, conceivably be that I brought it up because Beastly Boy Dec 1 #16

Ha Ha Ha, Eko Dec 1 #17

I was talking about what's in the cease fire agreement, not what's on your mind. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #21

Oh, I knew that since I quoted your own words. Eko Dec 1 #22

Read this tomorrow morning. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #25

You are welcome to point them out now, heck, I even invite you to. Eko Dec 1 #26

And as for this Eko Dec 1 #18

You chose the subject to comment on, without an invitation. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #23

I dont need an invation from anyone on here thank you very much. Eko Dec 1 #24

Once again you seem to gloss over that the attacks on Hezbollah moniss Dec 1 #6

They are attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #7

Hey Moniss!! Did you invite Beastly boy to comment on this thread? Eko Dec 1 #19