Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israel/Palestine

Showing Original Post only (View all)

moniss

(6,395 posts)
Sun Dec 1, 2024, 07:30 AM Dec 1

With ceasefire holding, Home Front Command eases restrictions in northern Israel [View all]

Last edited Sun Dec 1, 2024, 08:59 AM - Edit history (1)

This is the headline from an article in The Times of Israel dated 11/30/24. It is a little strange to have such a headline when the body of the article talks about Israeli military strikes since the ceasefire. It is particularly unusual in describing those strikes which include one on the city of Sidon. Unusual not least of all because Netanyahu the other day was quite forceful in stating that Israel reserves the right to respond militarily to violations of the ceasefire. OK. That also seems to be backed up by this statement from the article about an assurance by the US:

"The US has also reportedly provided a side letter specifying Israel’s right to respond to any violations of the ceasefire."

Well OK then. The ceasefire is described as being for 60 days during which the IDF withdraws from Southern Lebanon, Lebanon deploys 5000 troops to Southern Lebanon and Hezbollah is not to operate south of the Litani River. OK so then the article describes some Israeli actions against a vehicle etc. But then 2 mentions just kind of almost slip by. One says the IDF struck "deep" into Lebanon in one attack and then there is a specific mention of an IDF attack on the city of Sidon. Golly boys and girls I'm confused because it would seem that a violation by Hezbollah would have to be for something done south of the Litani River because the ceasefire doesn't say they can't be in Lebanon at all. It just says not south of the Litani River. Now I put on my Mr. Peabody glasses and looked at the map and it sure looks like Sidon is a pretty far distance north of the Litani River. Gee did the IDF have their map upside down? Why of course that must be it because I've been told that the IDF has never committed violations.

I guess it's just another one of those mysteries how an agreement got made in the Middle East that only has repercussions for violations for some parties but not all. Golly how could this keep happening over and over in these agreements with all of these concerned and honest arbiters for peace involved in the process? I'm sure such upstanding people just "overlooked" that aspect. Again. So let's sum up where we are on this fine Sunday morning. If one side commits violations they will be attacked militarily. If the other side commits violations they will get a vague mention in newspaper articles.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/with-ceasefire-holding-home-front-command-eases-restrictions-in-northern-israel/

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All Hezbollah has to do is stop shooting missiles comradebillyboy Dec 1 #1
If you read the article there were no missiles fired from Sidon. nt moniss Dec 1 #5
Oh, that completely erases the effect of tens of thousands of missiles fired from elswhere in Lebanon Beastly Boy Dec 1 #11
The report is about now and I think it's pretty obvious the moniss Dec 1 #13
The response was to your post, not the OP. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #20
The article is only a "mystery" to those who don't (or refuse to) pay attention to the text of the cease fire agreement. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #2
Too funny. Eko Dec 1 #3
Look up the definition of an offensive military operation Beastly Boy Dec 1 #4
Laughing even harder!!!! Eko Dec 1 #8
Brilliant! Beastly Boy Dec 1 #9
Sure sure, Eko Dec 1 #10
You never disappoint! Beastly Boy Dec 1 #14
Yeah, you dont control what you cant defend. Derp. Eko Dec 1 #15
And just to let you know. Eko Dec 1 #12
Could it possibly, conceivably be that I brought it up because Beastly Boy Dec 1 #16
Ha Ha Ha, Eko Dec 1 #17
I was talking about what's in the cease fire agreement, not what's on your mind. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #21
Oh, I knew that since I quoted your own words. Eko Dec 1 #22
Read this tomorrow morning. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #25
You are welcome to point them out now, heck, I even invite you to. Eko Dec 1 #26
And as for this Eko Dec 1 #18
You chose the subject to comment on, without an invitation. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #23
I dont need an invation from anyone on here thank you very much. Eko Dec 1 #24
Once again you seem to gloss over that the attacks on Hezbollah moniss Dec 1 #6
They are attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon. Beastly Boy Dec 1 #7
Hey Moniss!! Did you invite Beastly boy to comment on this thread? Eko Dec 1 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»With ceasefire holding, H...»Reply #0