Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

thought crime

(1,831 posts)

2. The cause of death was a storm, not a technology.

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Sat Jun 13, 2026, 08:24 PM

8 hrs ago

Last edited Sat Jun 13, 2026, 09:25 PM - Edit history (3)

A woman was killed in a freak accident.

No large scale evacuation or population displacement was required. No exclusion zone was created. No large scale medical screening was needed. No special handling of waste products was necessary.

Reference to deaths caused by radiation at Fukushima must be qualified with "So far...".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow! More deaths than those resulting from radiation exposure at Fukushima: [View all] NNadir Yesterday OP

An Odd Question wyn borkins Yesterday #1

The cause of death was a storm, not a technology. thought crime 8 hrs ago #2