Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,587 posts)
8. Let's be sure to drill for it, burn it quickly, and dump the water into the atmosphere lest we leave anything...
Sat May 23, 2026, 08:22 AM
Yesterday

...for future generations. This will ensure that among other things that we like to do them, they will have fewer resources, and - as the combustion product is water - even faster rising seas, and maybe even depleted oxygen levels to go with all the carbon dioxide we're leaving them.

They're not our problem, those future generations, and anyway, we fully expect them to do all the things we couldn't do ourselves, "by 2050," or "by 2100" to be totally "green," and if they don't do what we couldn't do ourselves, they can just screw off.

It's not like we should leave any resources for the future - although this is not really much of a resource.

The "home" by the way, is not a unit of energy, except among journalists, an indicator that one cannot get a degree in journalism if one has passed a science course with a grade of C or better.

The unit of energy is the Joule, a derived unit based on the SI units of mass, length and time.

There are zero hydrogen schemes of any of the stupid colors people attach to the sources, that are sustainable.

Zero.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»This Canadian Mine Might ...»Reply #8