Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,438 posts)
32. Thank you for recognizing my position on energy.
Fri May 8, 2026, 12:36 PM
21 min ago

Your remarks about my personality reflect a filter. I definitely hold a less than generous view of people whose scientific ignorance, of say, the second law of thermodynamics, for one example, which underlies the battery and hydrogen based fossil fuel greenwashing that goes on around here, the implications of mass to energy ratios for another.

At the end of my life I am certainly selective on my social relationships, who I value and those who I hold in a range between distaste and outright contempt.

Where one falls in that range is a function of the level of hypocrisy for one thing. We are all hypocrites to some extent. I am. I drive a hybrid car that gets excellent gas mileage for instance, but I am aware of the enormous moral cost of batteries, the human slaves who labor under horrific conditions to mine cobalt for batteries, the the general unsustainablily of the car CULTure in general. The car requires fossil fuels to run, and even if it has the lowest carbon intensity of any car on the PJM grid, it is still a dirty device.

My environmental views have always been guided by respect for wilderness. I have never had an ounce of respect, none, for people who look at wilderness and see an opportunity for land development for short lived industrial energy plants strewn across millions of square kilometers, trashed riverine and riparian zones. I also consider the oceans to be a valuable wilderness. For another example, I am aware of the carbon retention of the desert ecosystem's root matrices that all of our antinukes think should be rendered with bulldozing into solar industrial parks.

Thus I have even less respect for clowns crying crocodile tears for climate issues while applauding the destruction not only of benthic zones on continental shelves, but also the upper oceanic layers of water as proposed in this latest example of rotely applauded nonsense. Whence the wire to connect this shit? Whence the metal to make it?

I have spent most of my life in science. In my private life I more or less live and breathe it. I don't have a "few friends" who are scientists. Almost everyone I know in my professional life is a scientist. Not all of them are nice people, nor do they need to be nice people to do good science.

They only needed to do good science to be good scientists.

None other than Issac Newton, for example, was an asshole on a personal level. He took personal pleasure in signing death warrants of counterfeiters in his honorary role as Warden of the Mint. Albert Einstein was a terrible psychologically abusive husband to his first wife, who was a good scientist herself.

One can take a certain level of satisfaction in who doesn't like oneself. I do, right here at DU.

My views on energy have been formulated outside of my professional life, and are based on tens of thousands of hours over close to 40 years of work in the primary scientific literature, attendance at high level scientific meetings and lectures and personal reflections calculations and discussions. If there are dilletants with superficial knowledge whining and crying that they don't like me, who drool with disrespect for my efforts while musing illiterately that we should tear the shit out of the planet's seas and land for short term bourgeois unsustainable affectations related to so called "renewable energy," this will in no way offend me.

Nor does it dissuade me from my profound admiration for the work of the finest minds of the 20th century, who discovered nuclear energy, a tool with the potential, with all its risks understood, to save the world, only to have their work trashed and demeaned by intellectual Lilliputians.

I have no apologies for what I do here, nor my scientific knowledge nor my choices about whom I chose to respect or decline to respect. In turn, I am unmoved by those who hold me in barely disguised contempt, and again, can indeed take some satisfaction, indeed pleasure, from it.

No one in the antinuke cults should hold their breaths expecting me to apologize for my personality. They'll die faster than the planet they've done do much to kill.

Have a nice day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We never run out of ideas to destroy ecosystems for... NNadir Wednesday #1
You think this will destroy the ocean ecosystem somehow? ihaveaquestion Wednesday #5
Gotta Admit... GB_RN Wednesday #13
Know your trolls. WestMichRad Wednesday #16
OK, that makes sense then. Sad that they have to trash other's ideas, but scientists aren't always nice people. nt ihaveaquestion Wednesday #18
You know... I've worked with a good number of scientists. A few of them I call "friends." OKIsItJustMe 18 hrs ago #28
Thank you for recognizing my position on energy. NNadir 21 min ago #32
I want one of these for my bathtub,.... magicarpet Wednesday #2
They could also put windmills and solar panels on it creating even more energy ChicagoTeamster Wednesday #3
Awesome Auggie Wednesday #4
Solar Maninacan Wednesday #6
Lets say for the sake of argument that Prairie_Seagull Wednesday #7
Really inspiring! Sogo Wednesday #8
Was hopeful about this until I looked beyond the video to who is backing it ...Peter Thiel and other trump humping nazis JT45242 Wednesday #9
That is concerning... Hopefully the investment is only tied to making money and not ideological. nt ihaveaquestion Wednesday #14
Hmm progressoid Wednesday #20
Forgive me please, It may be I don't understand the process. Zackzzzz Wednesday #10
I'm sure they would have thought of that. ihaveaquestion Wednesday #15
My guess would be... Pluvious Yesterday #27
Dang! I was really hoping to see moreland01 Wednesday #11
Ok what am I missing here, I went to their website and did a google search. I cannot find out how they mitch96 Wednesday #12
They didn't talk about that. Presumably it would be via underwater powerlines, but IDK. nt ihaveaquestion Wednesday #17
The devil is in the details, eh? Great idea though...nt mitch96 Wednesday #21
Dat's a lot of environmental destruction too. hunter Wednesday #24
No energy transmission thought crime Yesterday #25
The ocean is a tough environment BeneteauBum Wednesday #19
That was my first thought, too. thought crime Yesterday #26
Maybe I'm just a cynic, but flvegan Wednesday #22
No numbers. hunter Wednesday #23
Thank you for posting this. OKIsItJustMe 18 hrs ago #29
I'm always happy to share... Pluvious 2 hrs ago #30
Yes, indeed, "a dearth." OKIsItJustMe 1 hr ago #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Brilliant idea for ocean ...»Reply #32