Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

harumph

(3,376 posts)
1. 2 cm/mo is astonishingly bad.
Thu May 7, 2026, 10:02 AM
Yesterday

" First documented in 1925, the city’s sinking is a result of centuries of exploitation of the groundwater. "

I guess that happens when you don't manage resources properly and allow unconstrained growth. In the US we've been relatively lucky - but there was a Tulane prof. yesterday speaking on KERA about New Orleans, rising waters and its inevitable relocation. He opined that the time was now to talk about relocation further inland. It's a sad commentary when people are only brought over to the side
of environmentalism when something catastrophic occurs in front of their eyes - meaning in the space of a few decades. On the slightly optimistic side, maybe the rate of subsidence will slow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Mexico City Sinking At Ra...»Reply #1