Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,994 posts)
4. The absolute "No Nukes" stance is not helpful
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:38 PM
Saturday

Pretending that nuclear power has no negative effects is simply dishonest.

I don’t want to see our "Gen-II" reactors taken off-line. At this time we. cannot afford that.

"Gen-IV" reactors are promised any day now (and have been for a quarter century.) I expect to see very little time between the commercial deployment of a "Gen-IV” reactors and the commercial deployment of fusion reactors. Of the two technologies, I would greatly prefer to see nuclear fusion.

I expect to see something from Commonwealth Fusion Systems first. My greatest regret in that regard is that (like a fission reactor) in the end, it is a thermal power plant.

The use of nuclear power to produce hydrogen is not a new idea. Here’s a hydrogen documentary from the late 1970’s which explains how it can be done, by multiple pathways. (Skip ahead to 12 minutes and 40 seconds. Or enjoy the ride.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»World Nuclear Association...»Reply #4