Environment & Energy

...impact of the useless, materially and land intensive wind garbage is low carbon when the wind is blowing, but intense when coal is being burned as it is in Germany and China when the wind isn't blowing. Dunkleflaute lasts in that coal dependent hellhole in Germany for months at a time.

The illiterate reading of what a Rankine cycle is applies to coal and gas plants that kill people when they operate normally in Germany, China, and everywhere on the planet. Of course there is not now and never will be a scientifically illiterate antinuke who cares about fossil fuels.

All one needs to do is to compare the carbon intensity of electricity China, Germany with that of France.

Of course there isn't a single fucking "renewables will save us" antinuke on the whole fucking planet who is interested in attacking fossil fuels, no matter how many times they illiterately pretend to read and care about a Hansen paper and care about its contents.

I have always said that the so called "renewable energy" advocates have zero interest in attacking fossil fuels. QE fucking D.

I don't need to "pretend" that antinukes are pro-coal, pro-gas, pro-petroleum. They demonstrate it every time they open their mouths, particularly with clearly poor reading comprehension skills and readily demonstrated intention to share their weak misinterpretation freely.

Nice try coalie. Nice try. No the word "nice" is not really operative since antinukism kills people, as reported by none other than Hansen and Kharecha.

With decent reading skills, one could look it up.

Have a nice day.