Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,386 posts)
17. Thank you for sharing your opinion.
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 02:02 PM
Wednesday

I would deny the authority of anyone to assert what every energy expert thinks, because I read broadly on energy science, having spent much of my free time doing so.

There are many people who have raised questions about so called "renewable energy" and its material and land use. I've probably referenced hundreds of them here over the years

Even the antinuke Benny Sovacool, who advocated ripping the seafloor apart for minerals for this junk has begun to question himself. Recently he discovered that the California desert is actually a vibrant ecosystem. I found that surprising, because he's generally an insufferable ass in my opinion.

There is however, I agree, no panacea. It is too late for nuclear energy to do what it might have done to save what is left to save or restore what might be restored.

This world, the burning world in which we live, is the final monument to the success of antinukes. People like my son are working to pick up the pieces.

My opinion which is not subject to reversal by whining, is that nuclear energy, invented by the finest minds of the 20th century and vilified by some of the smallest minds of that century and this, was, is, and always will be, the cleanest, if imperfect, form of energy there is.

No amount of chanting at this point, at the end of my life, is likely to dissuade me from this view, developed after decades of reading and thinking for which I will not apologize.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh good. After tearing the mountains to pieces for coal... NNadir Wednesday #1
They want to... 2naSalit Wednesday #4
Leaving big holes like this one OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #7
In the fast neutron spectrum with the dumped thorium from lanthanide mining for... NNadir Wednesday #10
Your insistence that "renewable energy" is not green is contradicted by the experts. OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #12
I don't credit "Appeal to authority" arguments. NNadir Wednesday #14
There's nothing particularly wrong with an appeal to authority. You use it all the time. OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #16
Well ain't that nice blue-wave Wednesday #2
Except...the next generation of EV batteries are supposed to use little to no lithium Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #3
There's always something wonderful on the horizon. NNadir Wednesday #5
The bulk of BC's household energy comes from hydro Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #8
I have been writing here for over 20 years on energy. NNadir Wednesday #11
Thank you for your opinions IMHO they resemble those of our President OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #19
Thank you for the guilt by association fallacy. Let's go full Godwin. NNadir Wednesday #20
No guilt by association intended OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #21
Oh, I sure hope I'm the "hydrogen will save us" moron you refer to. thought crime Wednesday #23
No, I wasn't thinking of you. If however you wish to... NNadir Thursday #24
Do you know how to use search engines? OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #9
Well if one doesn't give a shit about the laws of thermodyamics, one could... NNadir Wednesday #13
Your response to evidence is belligerent denial of the truth OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #15
Thank you for sharing your opinion. NNadir Wednesday #17
I'm sorry, I should have said "virtually" every expert OKIsItJustMe Wednesday #18
There's always some technology on the horizon that will supposedly save our asses from the fire. hunter Wednesday #6
Yes, we just have to do it. thought crime Wednesday #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Appalachian lithium cache...»Reply #17