Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,840 posts)
1. WOW! GREAT!!! "BY 2040!!!" Let's see...I've lived through "by 1980," "by 1990," "by 2000," "by 2010," with a...
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 04:00 PM
Thursday

...Amory Lovins special hydrogen HYPERcars in showrooms "by 2004" in between, and then "by 2020."

Now we have "by 2040."

Am I supposed to be impressed?

Here we are in 2026, with the concentration of the dangerous fossil fuel waste carbon dioxide having reached 430 ppm again.

Week beginning on February 22, 2026: 430.17 ppm
Weekly value from 1 year ago: 427.13 ppm
Weekly value from 10 years ago: 404.33 ppm
Last updated: March 05, 2026

Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2) (Accessed 03/05/2026.)

I'm not sure I'll live long enough to get into the nirvana of "by 2040."

It is, of course, bullshit fossil fuel marketing since it works to sell the bullshit sequestration lie. They have no fucking idea of where to put billions of tons of CO2 generated in the EU each year, no idea whatsoever.

The person who used to come here to rebrand fossil fuels as "hydrogen" is not particularly different than people who greenwash fossil fuels with claims about sequestration.

In 2023, the antinukes in Germany dumped close to 600 million tons of CO2 into the planetary atmosphere, this while shutting industrial plants because of high electricity prices.

Global Carbon Project Carbon Budget.

I'm sure they'll find lots of places in Germany to dump that each year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»2040 climate target: Coun...»Reply #1