Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,762 posts)
2. The inaccurate estimates are based on "melting ice" and other factors
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 06:44 AM
Thursday
How is it possible that so many scientific studies continued to use assumed sea level based on geoid models, when more accurate, global sea level measurements had been available for at least twenty years? This may have been due to the fact that most prominent studies were conducted by Western scientists, who were accustomed to the reliable results of geoid models in their own regions. As geoid assumptions worked relatively well, they may not have realized the need to use direct sea level measurements in their analyses. This assumption has led to an underestimation of coastal exposure in these studies, especially at the coasts of South-East Asia and the Indo-Pacific.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Sea levels are much highe...»Reply #2