Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wysimdnwyg

(2,258 posts)
1. There's a lot of science there....
Sat Nov 2, 2024, 09:31 PM
Nov 2024

My eyes started to cross after the first paragraph, and I’ll admit I couldn’t make it far, let alone all the way through the article. However, I will offer this:

The problem with lead in paint is that it’s easy for it to become airborne (sanding) or ingested (peeling or chipping). The problem with lead in water pipes is that it can dissolve in the water (read up on Flint, MI for info on why this often isn’t an immediate issue, but can quickly become a major problem). The problem with lead in gasoline is that it is burned, directly putting the lead into the air.

From what I understand about the use of perovskites in solar cells, none of this is an issue. It’s not likely that the lead will ever be released into the environment in an unsafe manner (perhaps via wildfires, but that would present a plethora of problems). The only time the lead would be exposed directly or dissolved would be during manufacturing or recycling of the panels, and that would be in a controlled manner.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There's a lot of science there.... wysimdnwyg Nov 2024 #1
As a scientist who follows the environmental literature closely, I share exactly zero of your reassurances. NNadir Nov 2024 #3
Well, this is why I listen to people who know more than I do wysimdnwyg Nov 2024 #6
The "plenty of concerns" with nuclear remind me... NNadir Nov 2024 #13
To be honest, I find that offensive wysimdnwyg Nov 2024 #14
I reported in another thread with data (Mauna Loa) now active... NNadir Nov 2024 #15
And yet you continue to misrepresent - or misunderstand - what I'm saying wysimdnwyg Nov 2024 #16
I would suggest it is the former OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #17
Depressing as hell. cachukis Nov 2024 #2
I am curious Bayard Nov 2024 #4
It seems to me that fossil fuel waste is the much greater threat. hunter Nov 2024 #9
While a comprehensive answer would be highly technical... NNadir Nov 2024 #12
Perovskites solar panels will not replace silicon panels until (unless) the lead problem is fixed. farmbo Nov 2024 #5
Naturally, the OP only talks about what its author wishes were true OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #7
New hybrid natural gas / wind / solar / battery power systems are not "cheaper" than nuclear power. hunter Nov 2024 #8
EIA: The Electricity Mix in the United States Shifts from Fossil Fuels to Renewables OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #10
NREL: 100% Clean Electricity by 2035 Study OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #11
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Ummmm...delicious....let'...»Reply #1