Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

NNadir

(35,124 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2024, 07:39 AM Sep 2024

During a year of extremes, carbon dioxide levels surge faster than ever: NOAA News Release [View all]

This article was released a few months back, but I missed it. It confirms what I've been seeing in my efforts to monitor the data, as I've reported on this website, most recently, and after the article was published, here:

Latest Update on the Disastrous 2024 CO2 Data Recorded at Mauna Loa

The NOAA news release:

During a year of extremes, carbon dioxide levels surge faster than ever

Subtitle:

The two-year increase in Keeling Curve peak is the largest on record


Some excerpts:

June 6, 2024 — Carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere faster than ever — accelerating on a steep rise to levels far above any experienced during human existence, scientists from NOAA and the Scripps Institution of Oceanographyoffsite link at the University of California San Diego announced today.

Levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) measured at NOAA’s Mauna Loa Atmospheric Baseline Observatory by NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory surged to a seasonal peak of just under 427 parts per million (426.90 ppm) in May, when CO2 reaches its highest level in the Northern Hemisphere. That’s an increase of 2.9 ppm over May 2023 and the 5th-largest annual growth in NOAA’s 50-year record. When combined with 2023’s increase of 3.0 ppm, the period from 2022 to 2024 has seen the largest two-year jump in the May peak in the NOAA record.

CO2 measurements sending ominous signs

Scientists at Scripps, the organization that initiated CO2 monitoring at Mauna Loa in 1958 and maintains an independent record, calculated a May monthly average of 426.7 ppm for 2024, an increase of 2.92 ppm over May 2023’s measurement of 423.78 ppm. For Scripps, the two-year jump tied a previous record set in 2020.

From January through April, NOAA and Scripps scientists said CO2 concentrations increased more rapidly than they have in the first four months of any other year. The surge has come even as one highly regarded international reportoffsite link has found that fossil fuel emissions, the main driver of climate change, have plateaued in recent years.

“Over the past year, we’ve experienced the hottest year on record, the hottest ocean temperatures on record and a seemingly endless string of heat waves, droughts, floods, wildfires and storms,” said NOAA Administrator Rick Spinrad, Ph.D. “Now we are finding that atmospheric CO2 levels are increasing faster than ever. We must recognize that these are clear signals of the damage carbon dioxide pollution is doing to the climate system, and take rapid action to cut fossil fuel use as quickly as we can.”

Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 program that manages the institution’s 56-year-old measurement series, noted that year-to-year increase recorded in March 2024 was the highest for both Scripps and NOAA in Keeling Curve history...


Of course, any disasters associated with this outcome are minor compared with the big bogeymen Fukushima and Chernobyl, one of which wiped out East Asia and the other, wiped out Eastern Europe. At least people use a lot of electricity generated using dangerous natural gas and dangerous coal to tell me so, although I'm, um, um, um, slightly skeptical about whether this is actually true.

And of course, we shouldn't worry; we should be happy. Afterall we're spending trillions of dollars on our reactionary impulse to make our energy supplies dependent on the weather just like the good old days before and including the 19th century. It's not like we need to spend money wisely; it's the thought that counts.

The amount of money spent on so called "renewable energy" since 2015 is 4.12 trillion dollars, compared to 377 billion dollars spent on nuclear energy, mostly to keep vapid cultists spouting fear and ignorance from destroying the valuable nuclear infrastructure.



IEA overview, Energy Investments.

The graphic is interactive at the link; one can calculate overall expenditures on what the IEA dubiously calls "clean energy."


Chant after me: "Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen, Solar, wind, batteries, hydrogen..."

It's working out just swell, all this chanting, isn't it?

Have a pleasant week.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»During a year of extremes...»Reply #0