Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Voltaire2

(15,090 posts)

1. The article casually acknowledges that '1.5' is in the rear view mirror.

Reply to hatrack (Original post)

Fri Apr 19, 2024, 09:12 AM

Apr 2024

"These damages are six times larger than the mitigation costs needed to limit global warming to two degrees."

Also as has become obvious, the imperial core will suffer the least, the periphery will suffer the most.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

c-rational Mickju NickB79

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Potsdam Institute - Even W. Drastic Carbon Action Today, 19% Losses In Global Income Through 2050 Already Baked In [View all] hatrack Apr 2024 OP

The article casually acknowledges that '1.5' is in the rear view mirror. Voltaire2 Apr 2024 #1

I believe that is correct. Mickju Apr 2024 #2