Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
5. That's what the article speculates and I'm sure to some degree it's true
Tue Jun 21, 2022, 12:35 PM
Jun 2022

Improving working conditions and better pay go hand-in-hand.

I didn't mean to imply they don't need to do both ... although if you pay people $30/hr instead of $15/hr, they're gonna put up with more shit to make that money.

So it becomes a balancing act for them to some degree. Some of each will likely be necessary, I concur

But since this is a localized analysis specific to 'where they need workers', with parameters involving distance from facilities, etc? I'd argue that the most important factor in expanding the radius away from your facilities from which workers are willing to come and work (and thus the population of potential workers) ... is probably most directly tied to 'what are you paying me to commute that distance all the time'? With 'conditions' being a close second.

MHO.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Leaked Amazon memo warns ...»Reply #5