Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Computer Help and Support

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bucolic_frolic

(53,598 posts)
Sat Dec 6, 2025, 04:37 PM Saturday

GMail now allows more than one email address and migration [View all]

A few years back, gmail required IIRC a "." - a period - in all addresses. I wound up with one I no longer like.

Anyone with experience in gmail migration?

The process is described as relatively simple. Create a new box, link the two, all the emalis in the first one to be copied over. BUT .. it won't allow Labels (Folders) to be moved over. Not sure what you do with that. AND gmail of course is tied up with YouTube .... so you have to change that, I think they allow you to append the new address to your existing YouTube in some way.

AND of course for Android users of smart phones, Google is omnipresent.

I'm beginning to wonder if the best idea is a slow move. Create a new address, and start to migrate one linked process or account at a time. Eventually the old one could just be left alone for archiving purposes.

Similar problems with Yahoo email. They are becoming more strict about frequency of logins. I have so much email from various things I do online, I don't even check one of my Yahoo accounts, but it probably gets 400 emails a week. I did that on purpose because who has the time to sort emails all week long??

Any ideas, warnings, success tales ... all appreciated.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Computer Help and Support»GMail now allows more tha...»Reply #0