Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
In reply to the discussion: Why Do Democrats Ignore Massive Voter Suppression? [View all]eniwetok
(1,629 posts)30. super delegates
Hillary got more votes in the 2008 primaries... though maybe this is a fluke given how Obama and Edwards took their names off the Mich ballot in protest of their moving up their primary.
Either way it doesn't matter if the super delegates EVER threw a nomination. The concept is inherently antidemocratic... giving party elites a chance to overthrow the popular vote in close elections in the same way that the Electoral College was intended to give elites a chance to veto the popular vote and Senate was designed to give elites a veto over the House. The federal system was largely built on a distrust of the People and gave elites a chance to thwart the popular will in the presidency, in Congress and the amendment process.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Status quo. That is the only game either party plays. Why no change in hackable voting machines?
LiberalArkie
Nov 2015
#5
New election laws are needed. And especially ones that with by pass the "States Rights"
MrWendel
Nov 2015
#9
We could have started by not gutting the VRA... But we missed the boat on that one.
Agschmid
Mar 2016
#34