United Kingdom
In reply to the discussion: If I can be so rude to ask, how are you planning to vote? [View all]Celerity
(47,569 posts)The constituency is simply Kensington, not Kensington and Chelsea. Kensington and Chelsea was abolished for the 2010 election, when the 19741997 Kensington constituency was recreated and Chelsea formed a new constituency together with the southern part of the former Hammersmith and Fulham constituency, called the Chelsea and Fulham constituency.
Emma Dent Coad won Kensington by 20 votes in 2017 (5 from me and my family), the first time we beat the Tories in the history of its modern iterations.
I do not trust the Lib Dems at all, they are Tory collaborators. They propped up that rotter Cameron for 5 years, 5 years of austerity, privatisation, and a general diminution of our welfare state and protections for workers and the less well-off.
Sam Gyimahs voting in Parliament Vote for Lib Dems, you get more of this rot in many cases:
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/24789/sam_gyimah/east_surrey
5 votes for, 17 votes against, 2 absences, between 20162019
Almost always voted for fewer MPs in the House of Commons
6 votes for, 1 vote against, 1 absence, between 20102016
1 vote for, 0 votes against, in 2010
0 votes for, 11 votes against, 4 absences, between 20112016
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/24789/sam_gyimah/east_surrey/votes
6 votes for, 1 vote against, between 20132015
0 votes for, 1 vote against, in 2016
5 votes for, 0 votes against, in 2016
33 votes for, 58 votes against, 8 absences, between 20112019
Consistently voted against strengthening the Military Covenant
0 votes for, 3 votes against, between 20112012
0 votes for, 15 votes against, 3 absences, between 20162019
Consistently voted for military action against ISIL (Daesh)
3 votes for, 0 votes against, between 20142015
12 votes for, 0 votes against, 6 absences, between 20112018
0 votes for, 5 votes against, in 2013
0 votes for, 11 votes against, 4 absences, between 20112016
Consistently voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support
4 votes for, 0 votes against, in 2012
47 votes for, 0 votes against, 7 absences, between 20122016
0 votes for, 8 votes against, 1 absence, between 20112014
Generally voted for lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles
6 votes for, 8 votes against, 2 absences, between 20102013
0 votes for, 12 votes against, between 20122015
1 vote for, 13 votes against, 4 absences, between 20112015
Voted a mixture of for and against higher taxes on banks
6 votes for, 9 votes against, between 20112018
Almost always voted against an annual tax on the value of expensive homes (popularly known as a mansion tax)
0 votes for, 3 votes against, 1 absence, in 2013
5 votes for, 0 votes against, between 20122013
9 votes for, 0 votes against, 2 absences, between 20102017
Almost always voted for reducing capital gains tax
8 votes for, 1 vote against, between 20102016
25 votes for, 1 vote against, between 20102016
0 votes for, 7 votes against, between 20112012
7 votes for, 0 votes against, 1 absence, between 20112019
2 votes for, 0 votes against, in 2011
5 votes for, 0 votes against, between 20102017
8 votes for, 0 votes against, between 20152016
9 votes for, 0 votes against, between 20152016
3 votes for, 0 votes against, in 2016
3 votes for, 16 votes against, 1 absence, between 20112019
Generally voted for lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles
6 votes for, 8 votes against, 2 absences, between 20102013
2 votes for, 0 votes against, in 2011
1 vote for, 2 votes against, 1 absence, in 2015
3 votes for, 0 votes against, between 20102011
Consistently voted against restrictions on fees charged to tenants by letting agents
0 votes for, 5 votes against, between 20142018
61 votes for, 8 votes against, 12 absences, between 20102015
As for Jo Swinson and the Lib Dems in General
hard pass
Here's more proof why it's hard to trust Jo Swinson on anything
https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2019/09/16/heres-more-proof-why-its-hard-to-trust-jo-swinson-on-anything/
Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson has pledged to stop Brexit altogether. But heres more evidence showing why its hard to trust her on anything.
What?!?
At party conference, the Liberal Democrats agreed to cancel Brexit if they get into power. Swinson said:
We will do all we can to fight for our place in Europe, and to stop Brexit altogether.
But if her voting record and refusal to work with Jeremy Corbyn wasnt bad enough, a new video has emerged showing that Swinson previously backed a referendum on UK EU membership.
In 2008, Swinson said:Link to tweetThe Liberal Democrats would like to have a referendum on the major issue of in or out of Europe.
As her voting record shows, Swinson did indeed vote for a referendum in 2008. And indeed, despite blaming David Cameron for the 2016 referendum, the Lib Dems supported this option while Nick Clegg was at the helm, who led the party between 2007-2015:Link to tweet
The Lib Dems are deeply stained by austerity. Dont trust them
With a new leader the party is enjoying a resurgence, but its support for the Tories in coalition cant be forgotten so easily
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/23/lib-dems-stained-austerity-trust-tories
The Liberal Democrats are back, or so were told, with Jo Swinsons leadership victory being pitched as the rebirth of the party. The unique conditions of Brexit have given the Lib Dems not only a reason to exist but the opportunity to detoxify their brand after their fatal coalition with the Conservatives, and to cast themselves as a reforming, progressive party in troubled times.
And yet remarkably little has changed since the days when Nick Clegg stood laughing in the Downing Street rose garden next to David Cameron as he signed Britain up to years of sweeping public spending cuts. When asked throughout this summers leadership campaign, Swinson (and her opponent, Ed Davey) consistently defended her partys role in austerity measures. In an interview with Channel 4 News, Swinson said she had no regrets about the coalition, stating it was the right move to get our country back on track. This is despite the fact it has been shown that austerity shrunk the British economy by £100bn, and has even been linked to 130,000 preventable deaths. Swinson acknowledged there were policies we let through [in coalition] that we shouldnt have done, naming the bedroom tax, but remained unrepentant on a whole host of others.
Instead, Swinson repeatedly claims credit for the Lib Dems being a moderating influence on the Tories. They may well have helped to rein in the Conservatives on some things (the party is said to have forced George Osborne to temporarily shelve child tax credit cuts) but this fundamentally misses the point: the Lib Dems werent coerced into the partnership, they voluntarily chose it, and as such were a reason every Tory cut that was passed was possible.
This isnt about holding grudges or some sort of ideological purity. Political parties naturally evolve depending on the political times, and progress in policy positions should be credited. It was four years ago this week that the Labour party adopted its abysmal abstention strategy for key welfare reform, but the party has since wrestled internally to have the strong anti-austerity message it holds today, winning back support in the process.
The same cannot be said for the Lib Dems. This is a party that as recently as last year spoke of sacrificing some of the poorest people in society to benefit sanctions in exchange for a 5p tax on plastic bags while in coalition. Nor are their MPs against forming a pact with the Tories again, with Swinson simply ruling out joining forces with Boris Johnson or any Brexiteer.
snip