Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wisconsin

JT45242

(3,074 posts)

4. Referring to actual state house vote same races not president

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 26, 2022, 10:00 AM

Oct 2022

I was referring to the percent of votes that the Republican candidate got for state house and state Senate. If I remember correctly from the SCOTUS case. The Republican candidates won 51 percent of the overall state vote and had a supermajority in either the 2016 or 2018 election.

Can't compare to popular vote of president because not the same.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Republicans Work for Voter-Proof Supermajority in WI [View all] StClone Oct 2022 OP

SCOTUS sucks...this should not be possible JT45242 Oct 2022 #1

"Common sense would say"... Does that apply everywhere? FBaggins Oct 2022 #2

Referring to actual state house vote same races not president JT45242 Oct 2022 #4

We all know what needs to be done d_b Oct 2022 #3