Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Washington

Karadeniz

(23,635 posts)

1. Will they be going only to a well regulated military unit so that they dont get into

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Thu Jan 16, 2025, 07:58 PM

13 hrs ago

the hands of non well regulated military hands? Once again, lawyers evade the intent of the 2A and try to make irrelevant loopholes seem pertinent. Does armed citizenry, not part of an official well regulated military group, sound like what the constitution allows? No. Every state who has legalized carrying around concealed weapons is in unconstitutional territory...no supervision or regulation whatsoever. How was the clear intent of the 2 A, which is no longer needed due to the creation of armed forces, so violated by SCOTUS?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State and gun shop clash at WA Supreme Court over high-capacity magazine ban [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 18 hrs ago OP

Will they be going only to a well regulated military unit so that they dont get into Karadeniz 13 hrs ago #1