Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(118,526 posts)
5. You are definitely in a situation where substantial alimony should be granted.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 09:57 PM
Feb 2017

It is virtually impossible to quantify the influence of one partner over the other partner's earning ability over that length of time. Although marital status shouldn't influence things such as promotions in reality it does as married employees are viewed as being more stable and committed to long term employment than single person. If there are children involved, the married employees has the availability of the partner to help provide childcare that the single person does not have so it also benefits the employer. Then there are the contributions that the employee makes towards to the retirement system that should be divided between the spouses. It appears that Illinois is reasonable about considering the income potential of both spouses as to determining the amount paid for alimony, but other states may only look at what is codified into law without giving consideration to the living circumstances of both partners.

At the same time, I could see that in the situation described in the OP it might be that it is a group of men that don't want their former wives to get anything which is definitely not fair. I would have to know more about the situation in South Carolina to comment any further though.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»South Carolina»Divorced South Carolinian...»Reply #5