Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Minnesota

Ocelot II

(122,797 posts)

1. Good. It's still an incoherent mess.

Reply to WhiskeyGrinder (Original post)

Wed Sep 15, 2021, 09:56 AM

Sep 2021

I'm all in favor of police reform - god knows MPD needs it - but we need to know exactly what we're voting for, and so far the proponents haven't been able to explain clearly what they want to do, how it should be done or who's going to do it.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge throws out latest Minneapolis policing ballot language [View all] WhiskeyGrinder Sep 2021 OP

Good. It's still an incoherent mess. Ocelot II Sep 2021 #1

Minneapolis voters routinely are asked to vote on charter amendments that are described as WhiskeyGrinder Sep 2021 #3

The usual charter amendment is much more straightforward and less important Ocelot II Sep 2021 #5

One more time sarisataka Sep 2021 #2

It's insulting, honestly. WhiskeyGrinder Sep 2021 #4

At this point there should be sarisataka Sep 2021 #6

Non-binding means do nothing. iemanja Sep 2021 #7