Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ClarendonDem

(720 posts)
4. That's what I said
Mon Oct 16, 2017, 09:52 AM
Oct 2017

Other similar laws ban magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, but this one proposes a ban on magazines that hold ten rounds or more. So this proposed law differs in that regard from others that have been upheld. So what did I get wrong?

On edit, perhaps my reference to NY's attempt to limit a magazine to 7 rounds was inarticulate. I was simply pointing out that the one effort to limit a magazine to less than 11 rounds - in NY's case, 7 rounds -- was ruled unconstitutional.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Illinois»Gun control measures prop...»Reply #4