Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(28,720 posts)

12. Nope, it doesn't do that at all but then again there isn't any risk of new reactors being built in two years.

Fri Jul 10, 2026, 04:31 PM

Friday

That means any with flaws are unlikely to be built.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal government proposes to lessen nuclear reactor environmental reviews [View all] BumRushDaShow Friday OP

The federal government Whip-poor-will Friday #1

what is wrong with these people? rampartd Friday #2

What could Chernobably go wrong? Ocelot II Friday #3

Fast Tracking THE MOST EXPENSIVE modrepub Friday #4

Of course they are. sinkingfeeling Friday #5

What could possibly go wrong? RexLipton Friday #6

Makes perfect sense here in TrumpLandia. NoMoreRepugs Friday #7

I'll take nuclear over a coal or gas plant any day. cstanleytech Friday #9

That doesn't mean that the Trump Administration displacedvermoter Friday #11