Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

LudwigPastorius

(15,361 posts)

32. Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm".

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:54 AM

Thursday

He's been hard at work ever since trying to make that happen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time [View all] highplainsdem Jul 8 OP

Is this the way of the future? RussBLib Jul 8 #1

It's more than a bit dystopian. I just added a paragraph about just how dystopian this might be to the OP. highplainsdem Jul 8 #4

Zuckerberg & masking tape Tasmanian Devil Jul 8 #2

He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and highplainsdem Jul 8 #5

There's a market out there for technology that neutralizes this technology. jls4561 Jul 8 #3

1 party consent and 2 party consent.. ExtraGriz Jul 8 #6

The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses... jmowreader Thursday #29

If you use these glasses and give them even johnnyfins Jul 8 #7

Why would anyone waste their money on these glasses? Raftergirl Jul 8 #8

have you SEEN what people will waste their money on? Skittles Jul 8 #10

Yes, unfortunately, Raftergirl Jul 8 #14

They shouldn't even be legal in the first place. Karasu Jul 8 #16

That's a bit far Polybius Jul 8 #22

We'll have to respectfully disagree on that, and I couldn't disagree more. Any potential positives of these things are Karasu Thursday #34

a pox on everyone who has enabled that POS Zuckerberg Skittles Jul 8 #9

They already made that movie. hamsterjill Jul 8 #11

How will sensitive info be protected purr-rat beauty Jul 8 #12

What could possibly go wrong? Baitball Blogger Jul 8 #13

You mean like... jmowreader Thursday #30

Meta is Palantir levels of evil and shouldn't exist. I have no idea how so many people still justify using their Karasu Jul 8 #15

Glasses better have IR ... squiregeek Jul 8 #17

If someone shoves those glasses up Elon's rear end Wicked Blue Jul 8 #18

I think you meant Zuck Polybius Jul 8 #23

All these white billionaires look alike to me Wicked Blue Jul 8 #25

Pepper spray to the rescue. twodogsbarking Jul 8 #19

Citizens should trademark and/or copyright their faces so that when Zuck uses their likeness they can - in2herbs Jul 8 #20

You can't copyright your face jmowreader Thursday #31

Meta is just a bunch of perverts. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Jul 8 #21

Hello Facebook users? luv2fly Jul 8 #24

They can F right off with that Bristlecone Jul 8 #26

Yet another reason I'm glad I'm a hermit Luciferous Jul 8 #27

The unanswered question: Why? Grins Jul 8 #28

Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm". LudwigPastorius Thursday #32

lol, aside from being illegal in many states fujiyamasan Thursday #33