Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,550 posts)
23. No one forced Carroll to agree to it. But if she hadn't she risked having a court stay the reward.
Sun Jul 5, 2026, 12:57 PM
Jul 5

It isn't unusual for a litigant to reach such an agreement to obtain a measure of certainty.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good for Judge Kaplan! greatauntoftriplets Jul 4 #1
Just release the money to her... Enter stage left Jul 4 #2
Not what the agreement between Carroll and Trump provides onenote Jul 5 #21
Sell some more crypto underpants Jul 4 #3
If he balks, sue his ass for a third time! Chasstev365 Jul 4 #4
He can't 'balk" The money is no longer his property. It is the property of the court. onenote Jul 5 #19
He's illegally grifted BILLIONS over the last two years, and here he is losing his shit over 5 mil? Karasu Jul 4 #5
Thank you Judge Kaplan! FakeNoose Jul 4 #6
Deadbeat. Always has been, always will be. mpcamb Jul 4 #7
I like the way you think. CBHagman Jul 4 #9
After tRump pays her the money BWdem4life Jul 4 #8
I don't understand. If there's a bond there, then it needs to be called. hamsterjill Jul 4 #10
It is not a bond. The money is held by the Court in a "registry" and is the property of the Court. onenote Jul 5 #16
Thank you. hamsterjill Jul 5 #20
Something hopeful to celebrate on this otherwise cheerless 4th of July. love_katz Jul 5 #11
So, now he has to "respond" again, by the 7th.. Escape Jul 5 #12
So, why hasn't the judgement been paid yet? Hugin Jul 5 #13
The "rich" gangster keeps on destroying the Justice system... Justice matters. Jul 5 #14
Because of the terms of the agreement that Carroll and Trump entered into in 2023 onenote Jul 5 #18
Thanks for the lengthy and convoluted explanation of the situation. Hugin Jul 5 #22
No one forced Carroll to agree to it. But if she hadn't she risked having a court stay the reward. onenote Jul 5 #23
Carroll's, "request" Bayard Jul 5 #15
Paying up will be an admission that he lost and is guilty, it's not just the money andym Jul 5 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rejects Trump bid t...»Reply #23