Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,537 posts)

19. That's already been decided in Caetano v Massachusetts in 2016 which said the 2A is not limited to the tech at the time

Reply to purr-rat beauty (Reply #18)

Wed Jul 1, 2026, 03:05 PM

Yesterday

And that decision was unanimous, no dissents. RBG, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor did not disagree with the per curium decision that 2A protects all arms including those not in existence at the time of the founding.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment [View all] BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP

Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be ImNotGod Tuesday #1

Or their fears could cause them to vote against the bans PatSeg Tuesday #2

If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Tuesday #3

Who said "small artillery"? And one boy's small is anothers ginormous. erronis Tuesday #7

If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Tuesday #4

how come they ignore the well-regulated part of the 2nd? pansypoo53219 Tuesday #5

You know, one of these years .. not in my lifetime ... the Court will finally take "well-regulated' into account. ificandream Tuesday #12

If you had participated in DU's long-ago Gungeon debates, you'd know maxsolomon Tuesday #14

language does change. pansypoo53219 Tuesday #15

Tell that to the "Originalists" maxsolomon Yesterday #16

This was addressed in the Heller decision PCB66 Yesterday #17

It would seem to me Mr.Bee Tuesday #6

Ballistic missile? Bullets made with spent uranium? (Or not spent yet.) erronis Tuesday #8

It was written for muskets Bayard Tuesday #9

With so many Americans living in fear of someone lost knocking on their door, Torchlight Tuesday #10

"Supreme Court will consider" J_William_Ryan Tuesday #11

The only possible way and i mean only possible way THIS supreme court would ban assault weapons is bluestarone Tuesday #13

If they're so original purr-rat beauty Yesterday #18

That's already been decided in Caetano v Massachusetts in 2016 which said the 2A is not limited to the tech at the time DetroitLegalBeagle Yesterday #19